100% FREE Updated: Apr 2026 Inequalities and Estimation Functional and sequence inequalities

Inequality in sequences and sums

Comprehensive study notes on Inequality in sequences and sums for CMI BS Hons preparation. This chapter covers key concepts, formulas, and examples needed for your exam.

Inequality in sequences and sums

This chapter introduces fundamental techniques for analyzing inequalities within sequences and sums. Mastery of these methods is crucial for establishing bounds, determining convergence, and performing estimations, which are frequently assessed in advanced mathematical examinations.

---

Chapter Contents

|

| Topic |

|---|-------| | 1 | Term-wise comparison | | 2 | Sum bounds | | 3 | Product-sum comparison | | 4 | Growth comparison |

---

We begin with Term-wise comparison.

Part 1: Term-wise comparison

Term-wise Comparison

Overview

Term-wise comparison is one of the cleanest ways to prove inequalities involving sequences and sums. The idea is simple: compare corresponding terms first, then add. In exam problems, this basic principle is often hidden inside fractions, radicals, powers, or recursive-looking expressions. The real skill is identifying a simpler upper or lower bound for each term. ---

Learning Objectives

❗ By the End of This Topic

After studying this topic, you will be able to:

  • Compare sums by comparing their terms individually.

  • Use upper and lower bounds on each term to estimate a whole sum.

  • Apply comparison correctly when terms are positive, negative, or sign-changing.

  • Use reciprocal and denominator-based comparison carefully.

  • Avoid invalid term-wise arguments in products and nonlinear expressions.

---

Core Principle

πŸ“– Term-wise comparison

Suppose two sequences satisfy

ak≀bkforΒ everyΒ k=1,2,…,n\qquad a_k \le b_k \quad \text{for every } k=1,2,\dots,n

Then adding these inequalities gives

βˆ‘k=1nakβ‰€βˆ‘k=1nbk\qquad \sum_{k=1}^{n} a_k \le \sum_{k=1}^{n} b_k

This is the most basic form of term-wise comparison.

❗ What This Means

If each term on the left is no larger than the corresponding term on the right, then the whole left sum is no larger than the whole right sum.

---

Basic Sum Comparison Rules

πŸ“ Finite Sums

If

ak≀bkforΒ allΒ 1≀k≀n\qquad a_k \le b_k \quad \text{for all } 1 \le k \le n

then

a1+a2+β‹―+an≀b1+b2+β‹―+bn\qquad a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_n \le b_1+b_2+\cdots+b_n

Also, if

akβ‰₯0forΒ allΒ k\qquad a_k \ge 0 \quad \text{for all } k

then

βˆ‘k=1nakβ‰₯0\qquad \sum_{k=1}^{n} a_k \ge 0

πŸ“ Bounding by a Constant

If for each kk,

m≀ak≀M\qquad m \le a_k \le M

then

nmβ‰€βˆ‘k=1nak≀nM\qquad nm \le \sum_{k=1}^{n} a_k \le nM

This is one of the fastest tools for estimating sums.

---

Comparing Fractions Term by Term

πŸ“ Same Numerator, Different Denominator

If

0<x≀y\qquad 0 < x \le y

then

1xβ‰₯1y\qquad \dfrac{1}{x} \ge \dfrac{1}{y}

So if denominators become larger, the reciprocals become smaller.

This gives a common exam trick: If dkβ‰₯ek>0\qquad d_k \ge e_k > 0 then 1dk≀1ek\qquad \dfrac{1}{d_k} \le \dfrac{1}{e_k} and hence βˆ‘k=1n1dkβ‰€βˆ‘k=1n1ek\qquad \sum_{k=1}^{n} \dfrac{1}{d_k} \le \sum_{k=1}^{n} \dfrac{1}{e_k} ::: ---

Positive-Term Comparison

πŸ“ Standard Positive-Term Logic

If

0≀ak≀bk\qquad 0 \le a_k \le b_k

for all kk, then automatically

βˆ‘k=1nakβ‰€βˆ‘k=1nbk\qquad \sum_{k=1}^{n} a_k \le \sum_{k=1}^{n} b_k

This is especially useful for:

    • rational terms

    • roots

    • trigonometric bounds

    • comparison of series with positive terms

---

Comparison for Infinite Series

πŸ“ Comparison Test Idea

If

0≀ak≀bk\qquad 0 \le a_k \le b_k

for all large kk, then:

    • if βˆ‘bk\sum b_k converges, then βˆ‘ak\sum a_k also converges

    • if βˆ‘ak\sum a_k diverges and ak≀bka_k \le b_k, then βˆ‘bk\sum b_k also diverges


This is the series version of term-wise comparison.

Even when the topic is framed in finite sums, this idea often appears in advanced problems. ---

Very Common Bounding Patterns

πŸ“ Useful Term-wise Bounds

For positive integers kk and nn:

    • if k≀nk \le n, then

1kβ‰₯1n\qquad \dfrac{1}{k} \ge \dfrac{1}{n}

    • if kβ‰₯1k \ge 1, then

1k+1≀1k\qquad \dfrac{1}{k+1} \le \dfrac{1}{k}

    • if k2β‰₯kk^2 \ge k, then

1k2≀1k\qquad \dfrac{1}{k^2} \le \dfrac{1}{k}

    • if 0≀x≀y0 \le x \le y, then

x≀y\qquad \sqrt{x} \le \sqrt{y}

    • if 0<x≀y0 < x \le y, then

1y≀1x\qquad \dfrac{1}{y} \le \dfrac{1}{x}

These simple inequalities power many larger estimates. ---

How to Build a Term-wise Estimate

πŸ’‘ Standard Strategy

To bound a sum
βˆ‘ak\qquad \sum a_k,

look at each term and try to replace it by something:

    • simpler

    • always larger, for an upper bound

    • always smaller, for a lower bound


Then add the new inequalities.

Examples of replacements:
  • replace a complicated denominator by a smaller or larger one
  • replace k2+k\sqrt{k^2+k} by something easier to compare with
    • compare k2+1k^2+1 with k2k^2
    • compare k(k+1)k(k+1) with k2k^2
    ::: ---

    Minimal Worked Examples

    Example 1 Show that βˆ‘k=1n1k(k+1)β‰€βˆ‘k=1n1k2\qquad \sum_{k=1}^{n} \dfrac{1}{k(k+1)} \le \sum_{k=1}^{n} \dfrac{1}{k^2} For each kβ‰₯1k\ge1, k(k+1)β‰₯k2\qquad k(k+1) \ge k^2 so 1k(k+1)≀1k2\qquad \dfrac{1}{k(k+1)} \le \dfrac{1}{k^2} Now add term by term: βˆ‘k=1n1k(k+1)β‰€βˆ‘k=1n1k2\qquad \sum_{k=1}^{n} \dfrac{1}{k(k+1)} \le \sum_{k=1}^{n} \dfrac{1}{k^2} --- Example 2 Show that for positive integers nn, βˆ‘k=1n1n+1β‰€βˆ‘k=1n1k\qquad \sum_{k=1}^{n} \dfrac{1}{n+1} \le \sum_{k=1}^{n} \dfrac{1}{k} For each k=1,2,…,nk=1,2,\dots,n, we have k≀n+1\qquad k \le n+1 so 1n+1≀1k\qquad \dfrac{1}{n+1} \le \dfrac{1}{k} Now add over all kk: nβ‹…1n+1β‰€βˆ‘k=1n1k\qquad n\cdot \dfrac{1}{n+1} \le \sum_{k=1}^{n} \dfrac{1}{k} Hence nn+1β‰€βˆ‘k=1n1k\qquad \dfrac{n}{n+1} \le \sum_{k=1}^{n} \dfrac{1}{k} ---

    When Term-wise Comparison Is Safe

    ❗ Safe Uses

    Term-wise comparison is safe when:

    • you compare corresponding terms

    • the inequality direction is correct for each term

    • you only add the inequalities

    • denominators stay positive when taking reciprocals

    ---

    When It Can Fail

    ⚠️ Avoid These Errors
      • ❌ If ak≀bka_k \le b_k, then ak2≀bk2a_k^2 \le b_k^2 without checking signs
    βœ… This is safe only under extra sign conditions
      • ❌ If ak≀bka_k \le b_k, then 1ak≀1bk\dfrac{1}{a_k} \le \dfrac{1}{b_k}
    βœ… False for positive numbers; reciprocals reverse inequality
      • ❌ Comparing sums by comparing β€œaverage size” informally
    βœ… Compare each term precisely
      • ❌ Using term-wise comparison for products without justification
    βœ… Addition is naturally compatible with term-wise inequality; products need extra care
    ---

    A Useful Symmetric Estimate

    πŸ“ Average-Type Bound

    If

    m≀ak≀M\qquad m \le a_k \le M

    for all k=1,2,…,nk=1,2,\dots,n, then dividing the sum bound by nn gives

    m≀a1+β‹―+ann≀M\qquad m \le \dfrac{a_1+\cdots+a_n}{n} \le M

    So the average also lies between the term-wise minimum and maximum.

    This often appears in olympiad-style estimation. ---

    Standard Patterns to Recognize

    πŸ“ High-Value Patterns

    • Replace each denominator by something smaller or larger.

    • Compare each summand with a constant.

    • Compare each summand with the first or last term.

    • Use positivity to preserve inequality under summation.

    • Use reciprocal reversal carefully when terms are positive.

    ---

    CMI Strategy

    πŸ’‘ How to Attack Term-wise Comparison Problems

    • First inspect one general term, not the whole sum.

    • Decide whether you want an upper bound or a lower bound.

    • Replace each term by a simpler comparable term.

    • Check sign conditions before taking reciprocals or squaring.

    • Only after the term-wise inequality is correct should you add.

    ---

    Practice Questions

    :::question type="MCQ" question="If 0<ak≀bk0<a_k\le b_k for each k=1,2,…,nk=1,2,\dots,n, then which of the following is always true?" options=["βˆ‘k=1nakβ‰₯βˆ‘k=1nbk\sum_{k=1}^{n} a_k \ge \sum_{k=1}^{n} b_k","βˆ‘k=1nakβ‰€βˆ‘k=1nbk\sum_{k=1}^{n} a_k \le \sum_{k=1}^{n} b_k","∏k=1nakβ‰€βˆ‘k=1nbk\prod_{k=1}^{n} a_k \le \sum_{k=1}^{n} b_k","1ak≀1bk\dfrac{1}{a_k}\le\dfrac{1}{b_k} for each kk"] answer="B" hint="Adding preserves the inequality direction term by term." solution="Since ak≀bka_k\le b_k for every kk, we may add the inequalities: βˆ‘k=1nakβ‰€βˆ‘k=1nbk\qquad \sum_{k=1}^{n} a_k \le \sum_{k=1}^{n} b_k So the correct option is B\boxed{B}." ::: :::question type="NAT" question="Find a lower bound for βˆ‘k=151k\sum_{k=1}^{5}\dfrac{1}{k} using the term-wise comparison 1kβ‰₯15\dfrac{1}{k}\ge\dfrac{1}{5} for k=1,2,3,4,5k=1,2,3,4,5." answer="1" hint="Replace each term by 15\dfrac{1}{5} and add." solution="For each k=1,2,3,4,5k=1,2,3,4,5, 1kβ‰₯15\qquad \dfrac{1}{k}\ge \dfrac{1}{5} So βˆ‘k=151kβ‰₯5β‹…15=1\qquad \sum_{k=1}^{5}\dfrac{1}{k} \ge 5\cdot \dfrac{1}{5}=1 Hence the required lower bound is 1\boxed{1}." ::: :::question type="MSQ" question="Which of the following are always true for positive numbers x≀yx\le y?" options=["1xβ‰₯1y\dfrac{1}{x}\ge\dfrac{1}{y}","x≀y\sqrt{x}\le\sqrt{y}","x2≀y2x^2\le y^2","1x≀1y\dfrac{1}{x}\le\dfrac{1}{y}"] answer="A,B,C" hint="Check monotonicity of reciprocal, square root, and squaring on positive numbers." solution="1. True, reciprocals reverse the order for positive numbers.
  • True, square root is increasing.
  • True, squaring preserves order for positive numbers.
  • False, it reverses the wrong way.
  • Hence the correct answer is A,B,C\boxed{A,B,C}." ::: :::question type="SUB" question="Show that βˆ‘k=1n1k+1β‰€βˆ‘k=1n1k\sum_{k=1}^{n}\dfrac{1}{k+1}\le \sum_{k=1}^{n}\dfrac{1}{k} for every positive integer nn." answer="True, by term-wise comparison" hint="Compare 1k+1\dfrac{1}{k+1} and 1k\dfrac{1}{k} for each kk." solution="For every positive integer kk, k+1β‰₯k>0\qquad k+1 \ge k > 0 So by reciprocal comparison, 1k+1≀1k\qquad \dfrac{1}{k+1}\le \dfrac{1}{k} Now add these inequalities for k=1,2,…,nk=1,2,\dots,n: βˆ‘k=1n1k+1β‰€βˆ‘k=1n1k\qquad \sum_{k=1}^{n}\dfrac{1}{k+1}\le \sum_{k=1}^{n}\dfrac{1}{k} Hence the inequality is proved term by term. Therefore the statement is true\boxed{\text{true}}." ::: ---

    Summary

    ❗ Key Takeaways for CMI

    • If ak≀bka_k\le b_k term by term, then their sums satisfy the same inequality.

    • Bounding each term by a constant gives a fast estimate for the full sum.

    • Reciprocal inequalities reverse direction for positive numbers.

    • Term-wise comparison is strongest when every term is positive and easy to control.

    • The main art is choosing the right simpler comparison term.

    • Check signs before using nonlinear operations like reciprocal or square.

    ---

    πŸ’‘ Next Up

    Proceeding to Sum bounds.

    ---

    Part 2: Sum bounds

    Sum Bounds

    Overview

    Sum bounds are inequalities that estimate how large or how small a sum can be under given conditions. In sequence and sum problems, this topic appears constantly: bounding a sum from below using product information, bounding a sum of squares using a fixed total, or using termwise estimates and Cauchy-type inequalities. In exam problems, the main challenge is choosing the correct inequality direction. ---

    Learning Objectives

    ❗ By the End of This Topic

    After studying this topic, you will be able to:

    • Find lower and upper bounds for sums under simple constraints.

    • Use AM-GM to bound sums from below.

    • Use Cauchy-Schwarz to bound sums and sums of squares.

    • Recognise when termwise bounds immediately yield a sum bound.

    • Decide when equality is possible in a sum bound problem.

    ---

    Core Idea

    πŸ“– What is a sum bound?

    A sum bound is an inequality of the form

    Sβ‰₯something\qquad S \ge \text{something}
    or
    S≀something\qquad S \le \text{something}

    where SS is a sum such as

    a1+a2+β‹―+an\qquad a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_n
    or
    a12+a22+β‹―+an2\qquad a_1^2+a_2^2+\cdots+a_n^2

    The main tools depend on what information is given:
    • fixed product
    • fixed sum
    • lower/upper bounds on each term
    • relation between sum and sum of squares
    ::: ---

    Termwise Bounds

    πŸ“ Immediate Bounds

    If
    m≀ai≀M\qquad m \le a_i \le M
    for each i=1,2,…,ni=1,2,\dots,n,
    then

    nm≀a1+a2+β‹―+an≀nM\qquad nm \le a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_n \le nM

    This is the quickest way to bound a sum when each term is individually controlled. ::: ---

    AM-GM for Sum Lower Bounds

    πŸ“ AM-GM Lower Bound

    For positive numbers a1,a2,…,ana_1,a_2,\dots,a_n,

    a1+a2+β‹―+anβ‰₯na1a2β‹―ann\qquad a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_n \ge n\sqrt[n]{a_1a_2\cdots a_n}

    This gives a lower bound on the sum when the product is known.

    Examples:
    • if xy=9\qquad xy=9, then
    x+yβ‰₯6\qquad x+y\ge 6
    • if abc=1\qquad abc=1, then
    a+b+cβ‰₯3\qquad a+b+c\ge 3 ::: ---

    Cauchy-Schwarz and Sum of Squares

    πŸ“ Cauchy-Schwarz Basic Form

    For real numbers x1,x2,…,xnx_1,x_2,\dots,x_n,

    (x1+x2+β‹―+xn)2≀n(x12+x22+β‹―+xn2)\qquad (x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_n)^2 \le n(x_1^2+x_2^2+\cdots+x_n^2)

    Equivalently, x12+x22+β‹―+xn2β‰₯(x1+x2+β‹―+xn)2n\qquad x_1^2+x_2^2+\cdots+x_n^2 \ge \dfrac{(x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_n)^2}{n} ::: This is one of the most important lower bounds for a sum of squares. ::: ---

    Fixed Sum, Minimum Sum of Squares

    ❗ Minimum Sum of Squares

    If
    x1+x2+β‹―+xn=S\qquad x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_n=S,
    then

    x12+x22+β‹―+xn2β‰₯S2n\qquad x_1^2+x_2^2+\cdots+x_n^2 \ge \dfrac{S^2}{n}

    Equality holds when all variables are equal:

    x1=x2=β‹―=xn=Sn\qquad x_1=x_2=\cdots=x_n=\dfrac{S}{n}

    This is a direct application of Cauchy-Schwarz or QM-AM. ---

    Fixed Product, Minimum Sum

    πŸ“ Another Important Sum Bound

    If
    x1x2β‹―xn=P\qquad x_1x_2\cdots x_n=P
    with all variables positive, then

    x1+x2+β‹―+xnβ‰₯nPn\qquad x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_n \ge n\sqrt[n]{P}

    Equality holds when all variables are equal.

    So fixed product gives a lower bound on the sum. ---

    Useful Special Cases

    πŸ“ Quick Forms to Memorise

    For positive x,yx,y:

      • x+yβ‰₯2xy\qquad x+y\ge 2\sqrt{xy}
          • x2+y2β‰₯(x+y)22\qquad x^2+y^2 \ge \dfrac{(x+y)^2}{2}


        For real x,y,zx,y,z:

          • x2+y2+z2β‰₯(x+y+z)23\qquad x^2+y^2+z^2 \ge \dfrac{(x+y+z)^2}{3}


        For positive a,b,ca,b,c with abc=1abc=1:

          • a+b+cβ‰₯3\qquad a+b+c\ge 3

    ---

    Minimal Worked Examples

    Example 1 If x+y+z=12x+y+z=12, find the minimum value of x2+y2+z2x^2+y^2+z^2. By Cauchy-Schwarz, $\qquad x^2+y^2+z^2 \ge \dfrac{(x+y+z)^2}{3} = \dfrac{12^2}{3}=48$ Equality occurs at x=y=z=4\qquad x=y=z=4 So the minimum value is 48\boxed{48}. --- Example 2 If xy=16xy=16 and x,y>0x,y>0, find the minimum value of x+yx+y. By AM-GM, x+yβ‰₯2xy=216=8\qquad x+y \ge 2\sqrt{xy}=2\sqrt{16}=8 Equality occurs at x=y=4\qquad x=y=4 So the minimum value is 8\boxed{8}. ---

    Equality Cases

    ❗ When is the Bound Sharp?

    In most standard sum-bound problems, equality occurs when all relevant terms are equal.

    Examples:

      • for x+yβ‰₯2xy\qquad x+y\ge 2\sqrt{xy}, equality at x=yx=y
          • for x2+y2+z2β‰₯(x+y+z)23\qquad x^2+y^2+z^2\ge \dfrac{(x+y+z)^2}{3}, equality at x=y=zx=y=z

          • for a1+β‹―+anβ‰₯na1β‹―ann\qquad a_1+\cdots+a_n \ge n\sqrt[n]{a_1\cdots a_n}, equality when all aia_i are equal

    Always check whether the problem’s constraints allow equality. ---

    Common Mistakes

    ⚠️ Avoid These Errors
      • ❌ Using a lower-bound inequality when the problem asks for an upper bound
    βœ… First decide the required direction
      • ❌ Applying AM-GM to numbers that are not known to be nonnegative
    βœ… Standard AM-GM needs nonnegative terms
      • ❌ Forgetting that the sum of squares is usually minimized, not maximized, under fixed sum
    βœ… Cauchy gives a lower bound
      • ❌ Stopping after getting a bound without checking equality
    βœ… A sharp answer needs the equality case
    ---

    CMI Strategy

    πŸ’‘ How to Attack Sum-Bound Problems

    • Identify the target sum clearly.

    • Check what is fixed: sum, product, or termwise bounds.

    • If product is fixed and terms are positive, try AM-GM.

    • If sum is fixed and you see squares, try Cauchy-Schwarz.

    • Check whether the bound is intended to be sharp, and identify equality.

    ---

    Practice Questions

    :::question type="MCQ" question="If x+y=10x+y=10, then the least possible value of x2+y2x^2+y^2 is" options=["2525","5050","100100","2020"] answer="B" hint="Use the lower bound for sum of squares." solution="We use x2+y2β‰₯(x+y)22\qquad x^2+y^2 \ge \dfrac{(x+y)^2}{2} So x2+y2β‰₯1022=50\qquad x^2+y^2 \ge \dfrac{10^2}{2}=50 Equality occurs when x=y=5x=y=5. Hence the correct option is B\boxed{B}." ::: :::question type="NAT" question="If abc=8abc=8 and a,b,c>0a,b,c>0, find the minimum possible value of a+b+ca+b+c." answer="6" hint="Use AM-GM." solution="By AM-GM, a+b+cβ‰₯3abc3=383=6\qquad a+b+c \ge 3\sqrt[3]{abc}=3\sqrt[3]{8}=6 Equality occurs when a=b=c=2a=b=c=2. Hence the minimum value is 6\boxed{6}." ::: :::question type="MSQ" question="Which of the following are always true?" options=["For positive x,yx,y, x+yβ‰₯2xyx+y\ge 2\sqrt{xy}","For real x,y,zx,y,z, x2+y2+z2β‰₯(x+y+z)23x^2+y^2+z^2\ge \dfrac{(x+y+z)^2}{3}","If each ai≀4a_i\le 4 for i=1,…,ni=1,\dots,n, then βˆ‘ai≀4n\sum a_i\le 4n","If xy=1xy=1, then x+y≀2x+y\le 2 for positive x,yx,y"] answer="A,B,C" hint="Check the direction of each inequality." solution="1. True by AM-GM.
  • True by Cauchy-Schwarz.
  • True by termwise upper bound.
  • False. By AM-GM, if xy=1xy=1, then x+yβ‰₯2x+y\ge 2.
  • Hence the correct answer is A,B,C\boxed{A,B,C}." ::: :::question type="SUB" question="Prove that for real numbers x1,x2,…,xnx_1,x_2,\dots,x_n, one has x12+x22+β‹―+xn2β‰₯(x1+x2+β‹―+xn)2nx_1^2+x_2^2+\cdots+x_n^2 \ge \dfrac{(x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_n)^2}{n}." answer="Use Cauchy-Schwarz." hint="Apply Cauchy to (x1,…,xn)(x_1,\dots,x_n) and (1,…,1)(1,\dots,1)." solution="By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, (x12+x22+β‹―+xn2)(12+12+β‹―+12)β‰₯(x1+x2+β‹―+xn)2\qquad (x_1^2+x_2^2+\cdots+x_n^2)(1^2+1^2+\cdots+1^2)\ge (x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_n)^2 Since there are nn ones, 12+12+β‹―+12=n\qquad 1^2+1^2+\cdots+1^2=n So n(x12+x22+β‹―+xn2)β‰₯(x1+x2+β‹―+xn)2\qquad n(x_1^2+x_2^2+\cdots+x_n^2)\ge (x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_n)^2 Dividing by nn, we get x12+x22+β‹―+xn2β‰₯(x1+x2+β‹―+xn)2n\qquad x_1^2+x_2^2+\cdots+x_n^2 \ge \dfrac{(x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_n)^2}{n} This proves the result." ::: ---

    Summary

    ❗ Key Takeaways for CMI

    • Sum bounds depend on what information is given.

    • AM-GM gives lower bounds for sums when the product is fixed.

    • Cauchy-Schwarz gives lower bounds for sums of squares when the sum is fixed.

    • Termwise bounds immediately give bounds on the whole sum.

    • Equality cases usually occur when the relevant variables are equal.

    ---

    πŸ’‘ Next Up

    Proceeding to Product-sum comparison.

    ---

    Part 3: Product-sum comparison

    Product-Sum Comparison

    Overview

    Product-sum comparison is a central theme in inequalities. Many exam problems ask whether a product is at most a certain sum expression, or whether a sum is at least a certain product-driven quantity. The main tool is usually AM-GM, but the real skill is recognising the direction of comparison and the condition under which equality occurs. ---

    Learning Objectives

    ❗ By the End of This Topic

    After studying this topic, you will be able to:

    • Compare sums and products of positive quantities using AM-GM.

    • Solve fixed-sum maximum-product problems.

    • Solve fixed-product minimum-sum problems.

    • Recognise equality cases quickly.

    • Use algebraic identities to prove sharp two-variable product-sum inequalities.

    ---

    Core Idea

    πŸ“– What is product-sum comparison?

    A product-sum comparison problem studies expressions such as

    x+yandxy\qquad x+y \quad \text{and} \quad xy

    or, more generally,

    x1+x2+β‹―+xnandx1x2β‹―xn\qquad x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_n \quad \text{and} \quad x_1x_2\cdots x_n

    under assumptions like positivity, fixed sum, or fixed product.

    The most important general principle is:

      • for fixed positive sum, the product is largest when the variables are equal

      • for fixed positive product, the sum is smallest when the variables are equal

    ---

    AM-GM: The Main Tool

    πŸ“ Arithmetic Mean - Geometric Mean Inequality

    For positive real numbers x1,x2,…,xnx_1,x_2,\dots,x_n,

    x1+x2+β‹―+xnnβ‰₯x1x2β‹―xnn\qquad \dfrac{x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_n}{n} \ge \sqrt[n]{x_1x_2\cdots x_n}

    Equivalently,

    x1+x2+β‹―+xnβ‰₯nx1x2β‹―xnn\qquad x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_n \ge n\sqrt[n]{x_1x_2\cdots x_n}

    Equality holds if and only if x1=x2=β‹―=xn\qquad x_1=x_2=\cdots=x_n ::: ---

    Two-Variable Product-Sum Relations

    πŸ“ Most Used Two-Variable Forms

    For positive x,yx,y,

      • x+yβ‰₯2xy\qquad x+y \ge 2\sqrt{xy}
          • xy≀(x+y2)2\qquad xy \le \left(\dfrac{x+y}{2}\right)^2

          • (xβˆ’y)2β‰₯0β€…β€ŠβŸΉβ€…β€Š(x+y)2β‰₯4xy\qquad (x-y)^2 \ge 0 \implies (x+y)^2 \ge 4xy


        All three statements are equivalent.

    These are the standard sharp comparisons between sum and product of two positive numbers. ---

    Fixed Sum, Maximum Product

    ❗ Maximum Product Under Fixed Sum

    If positive numbers x1,x2,…,xnx_1,x_2,\dots,x_n satisfy

    x1+x2+β‹―+xn=S\qquad x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_n=S

    then

    x1x2β‹―xn≀(Sn)n\qquad x_1x_2\cdots x_n \le \left(\dfrac{S}{n}\right)^n

    Equality holds when all variables are equal:

    x1=x2=β‹―=xn=Sn\qquad x_1=x_2=\cdots=x_n=\dfrac{S}{n}

    For n=2n=2, if x+y=Sx+y=S, then xy≀S24\qquad xy \le \dfrac{S^2}{4} ::: ---

    Fixed Product, Minimum Sum

    ❗ Minimum Sum Under Fixed Product

    If positive numbers x1,x2,…,xnx_1,x_2,\dots,x_n satisfy

    x1x2β‹―xn=P\qquad x_1x_2\cdots x_n=P

    then

    x1+x2+β‹―+xnβ‰₯nPn\qquad x_1+x_2+\cdots+x_n \ge n\sqrt[n]{P}

    Equality holds when all variables are equal.

    For n=2n=2, if xy=Pxy=P, then x+yβ‰₯2P\qquad x+y \ge 2\sqrt{P} ::: ---

    Standard Consequences

    πŸ“ Frequently Used Consequences

    For positive x,y,zx,y,z:

      • if xyz=1\qquad xyz=1, then

    x+y+zβ‰₯3\qquad x+y+z \ge 3

      • if xyz=k\qquad xyz=k, then

    x+y+zβ‰₯3k3\qquad x+y+z \ge 3\sqrt[3]{k}

      • if x+y+z=S\qquad x+y+z=S, then

    xyz≀(S3)3\qquad xyz \le \left(\dfrac{S}{3}\right)^3

      • if x+y=S\qquad x+y=S, then

    xy≀S24\qquad xy \le \dfrac{S^2}{4}

      • if xy=P\qquad xy=P, then

    x+yβ‰₯2P\qquad x+y \ge 2\sqrt{P}

    ---

    Minimal Worked Examples

    Example 1 If x+y=10x+y=10 and x,y>0x,y>0, find the maximum value of xyxy. Using xy≀(x+y2)2\qquad xy \le \left(\dfrac{x+y}{2}\right)^2 we get xy≀(102)2=25\qquad xy \le \left(\dfrac{10}{2}\right)^2 = 25 Equality occurs at x=y=5\qquad x=y=5 So the maximum value is 25\boxed{25}. --- Example 2 If xyz=8xyz=8 and x,y,z>0x,y,z>0, find the minimum value of x+y+zx+y+z. By AM-GM, x+y+zβ‰₯3xyz3=383=6\qquad x+y+z \ge 3\sqrt[3]{xyz}=3\sqrt[3]{8}=6 Equality occurs when x=y=z=2\qquad x=y=z=2 So the minimum value is 6\boxed{6}. ---

    Equality Case: Why It Matters

    πŸ’‘ Equality is Half the Problem

    In olympiad-style and CMI-style inequality questions, the answer is often not complete until you identify when equality occurs.

    For product-sum comparison using AM-GM, the equality condition is usually:

    allΒ comparedΒ positiveΒ termsΒ areΒ equal\qquad \text{all compared positive terms are equal}

    So whenever you see a sharp bound, always ask:
    • when is it attained?
    • is equality allowed under the given conditions?
    ::: ---

    Common Mistakes

    ⚠️ Avoid These Errors
      • ❌ Applying AM-GM to numbers that are not known to be positive
    βœ… Standard AM-GM requires nonnegative numbers, and most sharp forms are used for positive numbers
      • ❌ Forgetting the equality case
    βœ… Equality usually occurs when the relevant variables are equal
      • ❌ Claiming that product is always less than sum without conditions
    βœ… The comparison depends on positivity and constraints such as fixed sum or fixed product
      • ❌ Using a fixed-sum idea in a fixed-product problem
    βœ… First decide what is being held constant
    ---

    CMI Strategy

    πŸ’‘ How to Attack Product-Sum Problems

    • Ask whether the problem fixes the sum or fixes the product.

    • If the sum is fixed, think β€œproduct is maximized when equal.”

    • If the product is fixed, think β€œsum is minimized when equal.”

    • For two variables, also test (xβˆ’y)2β‰₯0(x-y)^2\ge0.

    • Check the equality case before finalising the answer.

    ---

    Practice Questions

    :::question type="MCQ" question="If x,y>0x,y>0 and x+y=14x+y=14, the maximum value of xyxy is" options=["2424","3636","4949","9898"] answer="C" hint="Use the two-variable fixed-sum product bound." solution="For positive x,yx,y with fixed sum, xy≀(x+y2)2\qquad xy \le \left(\dfrac{x+y}{2}\right)^2 So xy≀(142)2=49\qquad xy \le \left(\dfrac{14}{2}\right)^2 = 49 Equality occurs at x=y=7x=y=7. Hence the correct option is C\boxed{C}." ::: :::question type="NAT" question="If x,y,z>0x,y,z>0 and xyz=27xyz=27, find the minimum value of x+y+zx+y+z." answer="9" hint="Use AM-GM for three variables." solution="By AM-GM, x+y+zβ‰₯3xyz3=3273=9\qquad x+y+z \ge 3\sqrt[3]{xyz}=3\sqrt[3]{27}=9 Equality occurs when x=y=z=3x=y=z=3. Hence the minimum value is 9\boxed{9}." ::: :::question type="MSQ" question="Which of the following are true for positive numbers?" options=["x+yβ‰₯2xyx+y\ge 2\sqrt{xy}","If x+yx+y is fixed, then xyxy is maximized when x=yx=y","If xyxy is fixed, then x+yx+y is maximized when x=yx=y","If xyz=1xyz=1, then x+y+zβ‰₯3x+y+z\ge 3"] answer="A,B,D" hint="Separate fixed-sum and fixed-product statements carefully." solution="1. True by AM-GM.
  • True.
  • False. For fixed product, the sum is minimized, not maximized, when the variables are equal.
  • True by AM-GM.
  • Hence the correct answer is A,B,D\boxed{A,B,D}." ::: :::question type="SUB" question="Prove that for positive real numbers xx and yy with x+y=Sx+y=S, one has xy≀S24xy\le \dfrac{S^2}{4}, and determine when equality holds." answer="Use (xβˆ’y)2β‰₯0(x-y)^2\ge 0 or AM-GM." hint="Start from a square that is always nonnegative." solution="Since (xβˆ’y)2β‰₯0\qquad (x-y)^2 \ge 0, we get x2βˆ’2xy+y2β‰₯0\qquad x^2-2xy+y^2 \ge 0 So x2+2xy+y2β‰₯4xy\qquad x^2+2xy+y^2 \ge 4xy That is, (x+y)2β‰₯4xy\qquad (x+y)^2 \ge 4xy Now x+y=Sx+y=S, so S2β‰₯4xy\qquad S^2 \ge 4xy Hence xy≀S24\qquad xy \le \dfrac{S^2}{4} Equality holds if and only if (xβˆ’y)2=0\qquad (x-y)^2=0, that is, when x=y=S2\qquad x=y=\dfrac{S}{2}. Thus the product is at most S24\dfrac{S^2}{4}, with equality when the two numbers are equal." ::: ---

    Summary

    ❗ Key Takeaways for CMI

    • Product-sum comparison is mainly governed by AM-GM.

    • Fixed sum gives maximum product at equality.

    • Fixed product gives minimum sum at equality.

    • For two variables, (xβˆ’y)2β‰₯0(x-y)^2\ge0 is often the fastest route.

    • Equality conditions are essential in sharp inequality problems.

    ---

    πŸ’‘ Next Up

    Proceeding to Growth comparison.

    ---

    Part 4: Growth comparison

    Growth Comparison

    Overview

    Growth comparison is the study of deciding which of two expressions is larger without always computing exact values. In CMI-style questions, this often involves comparing powers, factorials, logarithms, radicals, and sums by using structure rather than direct expansion. The main skill is to choose the right comparison tool. ---

    Learning Objectives

    ❗ By the End of This Topic

    After studying this topic, you will be able to:

    • Compare expressions involving powers, factorials, logarithms, and radicals.

    • Use monotonicity, convexity, and concavity to compare nearby values.

    • Apply AM-GM and simple product bounds to factorial-type comparisons.

    • Compare large powers by scaling or normalising.

    • Detect when direct computation is unnecessary and a structural argument is enough.

    ---

    Core Idea

    πŸ“– What is growth comparison?

    Growth comparison means deciding whether one expression is less than, equal to, or greater than another by using known behaviour of functions and sequences.

    Typical examples:

      • comparing 5+55\sqrt{5+5\sqrt5} with an integer
          • comparing log⁑211\log_2 11 with an average of two logarithmic values

          • comparing nnn^n with n!n! or (n!)2(n!)^2

          • comparing sums like am+bma^m+b^m with cmc^m

    ---

    First Tool: Monotonicity

    πŸ“ Increasing and Decreasing Functions

    If ff is increasing, then

    a<bβ€…β€ŠβŸΉβ€…β€Šf(a)<f(b)\qquad a<b \implies f(a)<f(b)

    If ff is decreasing, then

    a<bβ€…β€ŠβŸΉβ€…β€Šf(a)>f(b)\qquad a<b \implies f(a)>f(b)

    This is the simplest comparison tool. It is often enough for:
    • square roots
    • logarithms
    • exponentials
    • reciprocal functions on positive intervals
    Example To compare 5+55\sqrt{5+5\sqrt5} with 44, square both sides because the square root function is increasing on nonnegative numbers. 5+55>4β€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Š5+55>16\qquad \sqrt{5+5\sqrt5} > 4 \iff 5+5\sqrt5 > 16 55>11\qquad 5\sqrt5 > 11 Since 5>2\sqrt5 > 2, the right side is true. Hence the expression is greater than 44. ---

    Second Tool: Concavity and Convexity

    πŸ“– Concavity and Convexity

    A function with fβ€²β€²(x)<0f''(x)<0 on an interval is concave there.

    A function with fβ€²β€²(x)>0f''(x)>0 on an interval is convex there.

    πŸ“ Midpoint Comparison

    If ff is concave, then

    f(x+y2)β‰₯f(x)+f(y)2\qquad f\left(\dfrac{x+y}{2}\right) \ge \dfrac{f(x)+f(y)}{2}

    If ff is convex, then

    f(x+y2)≀f(x)+f(y)2\qquad f\left(\dfrac{x+y}{2}\right) \le \dfrac{f(x)+f(y)}{2}

    This is extremely useful for growth comparison.

    Important examples

    • log⁑x\log x is concave on x>0x>0
    • x\sqrt{x} is concave on x>0x>0
      • xrx^r is convex on x>0x>0 for r>1r>1
      ---

      Logarithmic Comparison

      πŸ“ Concavity of log⁑x\log x

      Since log⁑x\log x is concave on positive numbers,

      log⁑(x+y2)β‰₯log⁑x+log⁑y2\qquad \log\left(\dfrac{x+y}{2}\right) \ge \dfrac{\log x + \log y}{2}

      Equivalently, log⁑x≀log⁑a+log⁑b2\qquad \log x \le \dfrac{\log a + \log b}{2} whenever x≀abx \le \sqrt{ab} This is often the cleanest way to compare one logarithm with the average of two others. Example To compare log⁑211and1+log⁑2612\qquad \log_2 11 \quad \text{and} \quad \dfrac{1+\log_2 61}{2} note that 1=log⁑221=\log_2 2, so the right-hand side is log⁑22+log⁑2612\qquad \dfrac{\log_2 2 + \log_2 61}{2} Using log rules, log⁑22+log⁑2612=log⁑2(122)2=log⁑2122\qquad \dfrac{\log_2 2 + \log_2 61}{2} = \dfrac{\log_2(122)}{2} = \log_2 \sqrt{122} So the comparison becomes log⁑211<?log⁑2122\qquad \log_2 11 \stackrel{?}{<} \log_2 \sqrt{122} Since log⁑2x\log_2 x is increasing, this is equivalent to 11<122\qquad 11 < \sqrt{122} which is false because 121<122121<122, so actually 11<12211<\sqrt{122} is true. Hence log⁑211<1+log⁑2612\qquad \log_2 11 < \dfrac{1+\log_2 61}{2} ---

      Third Tool: AM-GM

      πŸ“ AM-GM

      For positive real numbers a1,a2,…,ana_1,a_2,\dots,a_n,

      a1+a2+β‹―+annβ‰₯a1a2β‹―ann\qquad \dfrac{a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_n}{n} \ge \sqrt[n]{a_1a_2\cdots a_n}

      Equality holds if and only if all the terms are equal.

      AM-GM is one of the most effective tools for growth comparison.

      Common uses

      • comparing products with powers
      • estimating factorials
      • comparing symmetric expressions
      ---

      Factorial vs Power Comparisons

      πŸ“ A Useful Pairing Trick

      To compare (n!)2(n!)^2 with nnn^n, write

      (n!)2=∏k=1nk(n+1βˆ’k)\qquad (n!)^2 = \prod_{k=1}^{n} k(n+1-k)

      Now compare each factor k(n+1βˆ’k)k(n+1-k) with nn.

      For 1≀k≀n1 \le k \le n, k(n+1βˆ’k)β‰₯n\qquad k(n+1-k) \ge n because k(n+1βˆ’k)βˆ’n=(kβˆ’1)(nβˆ’k)β‰₯0\qquad k(n+1-k)-n = (k-1)(n-k) \ge 0 Hence every factor is at least nn, so (n!)2=∏k=1nk(n+1βˆ’k)β‰₯nn\qquad (n!)^2 = \prod_{k=1}^{n} k(n+1-k) \ge n^n This is a very elegant comparison. Example With n=2023n=2023, (2023!)2β‰₯(2023)2023\qquad (2023!)^2 \ge (2023)^{2023} and in fact the inequality is strict because not all factors are exactly 20232023. So (2023)2023<(2023!)2\qquad (2023)^{2023} < (2023!)^2 ---

      Fourth Tool: Normalisation

      πŸ“ Compare by Dividing by a Common Large Quantity

      When comparing large powers like

      am+bmandcm\qquad a^m+b^m \quad \text{and} \quad c^m

      with a,b<ca,b<c, divide everything by cmc^m.

      Then the comparison becomes

      (ac)m+(bc)m<?1\qquad \left(\dfrac{a}{c}\right)^m + \left(\dfrac{b}{c}\right)^m \stackrel{?}{<} 1

      This is usually much easier. Example Compare 92100+93100and94100\qquad 92^{100}+93^{100} \quad \text{and} \quad 94^{100} Divide by 9410094^{100}: (9294)100+(9394)100<?1\qquad \left(\dfrac{92}{94}\right)^{100} + \left(\dfrac{93}{94}\right)^{100} \stackrel{?}{<} 1 Now 9294<9394<1\qquad \dfrac{92}{94} < \dfrac{93}{94} < 1 So (9294)100<(9394)100\qquad \left(\dfrac{92}{94}\right)^{100} < \left(\dfrac{93}{94}\right)^{100} Hence the sum is less than 2(9394)100\qquad 2\left(\dfrac{93}{94}\right)^{100} It remains to show 2(9394)100<1\qquad 2\left(\dfrac{93}{94}\right)^{100} < 1 That is equivalent to 2<(9493)100\qquad 2 < \left(\dfrac{94}{93}\right)^{100} which is true because (1+193)100>2\left(1+\dfrac{1}{93}\right)^{100} > 2 is easy to verify using binomial expansion or exponential growth. So 92100+93100<94100\qquad 92^{100}+93^{100} < 94^{100} ---

      Fifth Tool: Replace by Simpler Bounds

      πŸ’‘ Bounding Strategy

      If exact comparison is hard, replace each expression by an easier upper or lower bound.

      Typical examples:

        • 5>2\sqrt5 > 2
            • log⁑\log is increasing

            • 1+x<ex1+x < e^x for x>0x>0

            • (1+t)n>1+nt(1+t)^n > 1+nt for t>βˆ’1t>-1 and integer nβ‰₯1n\ge1

      This often reduces a difficult-looking inequality to a short argument. ---

      Standard Growth Hierarchy

      πŸ“ Very Important Order of Growth

      For large nn, the typical growth order is

      log⁑nβ‰ͺnΞ±β‰ͺanβ‰ͺn!β‰ͺnn\qquad \log n \ll n^\alpha \ll a^n \ll n! \ll n^n

      for fixed Ξ±>0\alpha>0 and fixed a>1a>1.

      This is useful intuition, but in olympiad-style or exam questions you still need a proof for the exact comparison asked. ---

      Minimal Worked Examples

      Example 1 Compare 17\sqrt{17} and 44. Since the square root function is increasing, 17>4β€…β€ŠβŸΊβ€…β€Š17>16\qquad \sqrt{17} > 4 \iff 17 > 16 which is true. --- Example 2 Compare 95+959^5+9^5 and 10510^5. We have 95+95=2β‹…95\qquad 9^5+9^5 = 2\cdot 9^5 So compare 22 and (109)5\left(\dfrac{10}{9}\right)^5. Since (109)5>1+59\qquad \left(\dfrac{10}{9}\right)^5 > 1+\dfrac{5}{9} we get (109)5>149>1.5\left(\dfrac{10}{9}\right)^5 > \dfrac{14}{9} > 1.5, but this is not enough alone to beat 22. Compute directly: 2β‹…95=118098\qquad 2\cdot 9^5 = 118098 and 105=100000\qquad 10^5 = 100000 So here 95+95>105\qquad 9^5+9^5 > 10^5 This shows that normalisation is useful, but the estimate must be strong enough. ---

      Common Mistakes

      ⚠️ Avoid These Errors
        • ❌ Comparing large expressions by raw decimal approximation too early
      βœ… First look for structure, monotonicity, or factorisation
        • ❌ Using concavity or convexity in the wrong direction
      βœ… Check whether the function bends upward or downward
        • ❌ Forgetting that logarithms are increasing only on positive inputs
      βœ… Always check domain
        • ❌ Using β€œgrowth order” intuition as a proof in a finite problem
      βœ… A finite comparison still needs a clear argument
        • ❌ Applying AM-GM to nonpositive terms
      βœ… AM-GM requires positivity
      ---

      CMI Strategy

      πŸ’‘ How to Attack Growth Comparison Questions

      • First identify the expression type: radical, logarithm, power, factorial, or sum of powers.

      • Check whether monotonicity solves it immediately.

      • If an average appears, test concavity or convexity.

      • If factorials appear, try pairing factors or AM-GM.

      • If large powers appear, divide by the largest power.

      • Use a clean inequality, not a messy numerical approximation.

      ---

      Practice Questions

      :::question type="MCQ" question="Which function is concave on (0,∞)(0,\infty)?" options=["x2x^2","x3x^3","log⁑x\log x","exe^x"] answer="C" hint="Check second derivatives or known standard facts." solution="Among the given functions, log⁑x\log x is concave on (0,∞)(0,\infty). The functions x2x^2, x3x^3 on (0,∞)(0,\infty), and exe^x are convex there. Hence the correct option is C\boxed{C}." ::: :::question type="NAT" question="Evaluate the sign of (6!)2βˆ’66(6!)^2-6^6 by entering 11 if positive, 00 if zero, and βˆ’1-1 if negative." answer="1" hint="Use the pairing trick (n!)2=∏k=1nk(n+1βˆ’k)(n!)^2=\prod_{k=1}^n k(n+1-k)." solution="We write (6!)2=∏k=16k(7βˆ’k)\qquad (6!)^2 = \prod_{k=1}^{6} k(7-k) Now each factor k(7βˆ’k)k(7-k) is at least 66, and for some values it is strictly bigger than 66. Hence (6!)2>66\qquad (6!)^2 > 6^6 So the quantity (6!)2βˆ’66(6!)^2-6^6 is positive. Therefore the required answer is 1\boxed{1}." ::: :::question type="MSQ" question="Which of the following statements are true?" options=["10>3\sqrt{10}>3","log⁑28<log⁑29\log_2 8<\log_2 9","If ff is concave, then f(x+y2)β‰₯f(x)+f(y)2f\left(\frac{x+y}{2}\right)\ge \frac{f(x)+f(y)}{2}","For all positive integers nn, (n!)2β‰₯nn(n!)^2\ge n^n"] answer="A,B,C,D" hint="Use monotonicity, concavity, and factorial pairing." solution="1. True, since 10>910>9 and square root is increasing.
    • True, since log⁑2x\log_2 x is increasing and 8<98<9.
    • True, this is the midpoint form of concavity.
    • True, because (n!)2=∏k=1nk(n+1βˆ’k)(n!)^2=\prod_{k=1}^n k(n+1-k) and each factor is at least nn.
    • Hence the correct answer is A,B,C,D\boxed{A,B,C,D}." ::: :::question type="SUB" question="Explain why (n!)2β‰₯nn(n!)^2\ge n^n for every positive integer nn." answer="Write (n!)2=∏k=1nk(n+1βˆ’k)(n!)^2=\prod_{k=1}^n k(n+1-k) and note each factor is at least nn." hint="Pair the kkth and (n+1βˆ’k)(n+1-k)th factors." solution="We have (n!)2=(∏k=1nk)(∏k=1n(n+1βˆ’k))=∏k=1nk(n+1βˆ’k)\qquad (n!)^2 = \left(\prod_{k=1}^n k\right)\left(\prod_{k=1}^n (n+1-k)\right)=\prod_{k=1}^n k(n+1-k) Now for each kk, k(n+1βˆ’k)βˆ’n=(kβˆ’1)(nβˆ’k)β‰₯0\qquad k(n+1-k)-n=(k-1)(n-k)\ge 0 Hence k(n+1βˆ’k)β‰₯n\qquad k(n+1-k)\ge n Therefore every factor in the product is at least nn, so (n!)2=∏k=1nk(n+1βˆ’k)β‰₯∏k=1nn=nn\qquad (n!)^2 = \prod_{k=1}^n k(n+1-k)\ge \prod_{k=1}^n n = n^n Thus (n!)2β‰₯nn(n!)^2\ge n^n for every positive integer nn." ::: ---

      Summary

      ❗ Key Takeaways for CMI

      • Growth comparison depends more on choosing the right tool than on long computation.

      • Use monotonicity for radicals, logs, and exponentials.

      • Use concavity and convexity when averages or midpoint comparisons appear.

      • Use AM-GM or factor pairing for factorial comparisons.

      • Use normalisation when comparing sums of large powers with a single larger power.

      • A clean structural proof is usually better than a decimal estimate.

      ---

      Chapter Summary

      ❗ Inequality in sequences and sums β€” Key Points

      Term-wise Comparison and Monotonicity: The fundamental approach for establishing inequalities between sequences and their sums often relies on demonstrating term-by-term dominance or consistent monotonicity.
      Bounding Sums and Products: Integral comparison, the AM-GM inequality, and Cauchy-Schwarz are indispensable tools for deriving precise upper and lower bounds for both finite and infinite sums and products.
      Growth Rates and Asymptotic Analysis: Understanding the asymptotic behavior of sequence terms is crucial for evaluating limits of sums, determining convergence properties, and making accurate approximations, frequently involving comparisons with known series.
      Jensen's Inequality: This powerful principle connects the convexity or concavity of functions to inequalities involving sums and averages, offering a versatile approach for problems with functional transformations.
      Classic Inequalities: Proficient application of foundational inequalities such as AM-GM, Cauchy-Schwarz, Bernoulli's, Rearrangement, and Chebyshev's forms the bedrock for solving a wide spectrum of complex problems involving sequences and sums.
      Inductive and Constructive Methods: Many sequence-based inequalities can be rigorously proven through mathematical induction or by ingeniously constructing auxiliary sequences or functions that simplify the comparison process.

      ---

      Chapter Review Questions

      :::question type="MCQ" question="Consider the sum Sn=βˆ‘k=1n1kS_n = \sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{\sqrt{k}}. Which of the following is true for sufficiently large nn?" options=["Sn<nS_n < \sqrt{n}", "Snβ‰ˆ2nS_n \approx 2\sqrt{n}", "Sn>nS_n > n", "SnS_n converges to a finite value."] answer="Snβ‰ˆ2nS_n \approx 2\sqrt{n}" hint="Compare the sum with an integral of a decreasing function." solution="The function f(x)=1/xf(x) = 1/\sqrt{x} is decreasing. We can bound the sum using integrals:

      ∫1n+11xdx<βˆ‘k=1n1k<1+∫1n1xdx\int_1^{n+1} \frac{1}{\sqrt{x}} dx < \sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{\sqrt{k}} < 1 + \int_1^n \frac{1}{\sqrt{x}} dx

      Evaluating the integrals:
      [2x]1n+1<Sn<1+[2x]1n[2\sqrt{x}]_1^{n+1} < S_n < 1 + [2\sqrt{x}]_1^n

      2n+1βˆ’2<Sn<1+2nβˆ’22\sqrt{n+1} - 2 < S_n < 1 + 2\sqrt{n} - 2

      2n+1βˆ’2<Sn<2nβˆ’12\sqrt{n+1} - 2 < S_n < 2\sqrt{n} - 1

      As nβ†’βˆžn \to \infty, SnS_n grows approximately as 2n2\sqrt{n}. Therefore, Snβ‰ˆ2nS_n \approx 2\sqrt{n} is the correct statement."
      :::

      :::question type="NAT" question="Let a1,a2,…,ana_1, a_2, \dots, a_n be positive real numbers such that βˆ‘i=1nai=1\sum_{i=1}^n a_i = 1. Find the minimum value of βˆ‘i=1n1ai\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{a_i}." answer="n^2" hint="Consider using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality or AM-HM inequality." solution="By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, for positive real numbers xi,yix_i, y_i:

      (βˆ‘i=1nxi2)(βˆ‘i=1nyi2)β‰₯(βˆ‘i=1nxiyi)2\left(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2\right) \left(\sum_{i=1}^n y_i^2\right) \ge \left(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i\right)^2

      Let xi=aix_i = \sqrt{a_i} and yi=1aiy_i = \frac{1}{\sqrt{a_i}}. Then xiyi=1x_i y_i = 1.
      (βˆ‘i=1n(ai)2)(βˆ‘i=1n(1ai)2)β‰₯(βˆ‘i=1n1)2\left(\sum_{i=1}^n (\sqrt{a_i})^2\right) \left(\sum_{i=1}^n \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{a_i}}\right)^2\right) \ge \left(\sum_{i=1}^n 1\right)^2

      (βˆ‘i=1nai)(βˆ‘i=1n1ai)β‰₯n2\left(\sum_{i=1}^n a_i\right) \left(\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{a_i}\right) \ge n^2

      Given βˆ‘i=1nai=1\sum_{i=1}^n a_i = 1, we substitute this into the inequality:
      (1)(βˆ‘i=1n1ai)β‰₯n2(1) \left(\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{a_i}\right) \ge n^2

      Thus, βˆ‘i=1n1aiβ‰₯n2\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{a_i} \ge n^2. Equality holds when ai=1/na_i = 1/n for all ii.
      The minimum value is n2n^2."
      :::

      :::question type="MCQ" question="Let an=(1+1n)na_n = \left(1 + \frac{1}{n}\right)^n and bn=βˆ‘k=0n1k!b_n = \sum_{k=0}^n \frac{1}{k!}. Which of the following statements is true?" options=["an>bna_n > b_n for all nβ‰₯1n \ge 1.", "lim⁑nβ†’βˆžan=lim⁑nβ†’βˆžbn\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = \lim_{n \to \infty} b_n.", "ana_n converges but bnb_n diverges.", "bnb_n converges but ana_n diverges."] answer="lim⁑nβ†’βˆžan=lim⁑nβ†’βˆžbn\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = \lim_{n \to \infty} b_n." hint="Recall the definitions of the mathematical constant ee." solution="Both sequences ana_n and bnb_n are fundamental definitions or approximations of the mathematical constant ee.
      The limit of an=(1+1n)na_n = \left(1 + \frac{1}{n}\right)^n as nβ†’βˆžn \to \infty is ee.
      The limit of bn=βˆ‘k=0n1k!b_n = \sum_{k=0}^n \frac{1}{k!} as nβ†’βˆžn \to \infty is also ee (this is the Taylor series expansion for exe^x evaluated at x=1x=1).
      Since both sequences converge to the same value ee, their limits are equal.
      (Note: It is also true that an<bna_n < b_n for all nβ‰₯1n \ge 1, but the question asks for a true statement, and the limit equality is unequivocally true.)"
      :::

      :::question type="NAT" question="Let S=βˆ‘n=1991n+n+1S = \sum_{n=1}^{99} \frac{1}{\sqrt{n} + \sqrt{n+1}}. Find the value of SS." answer="9" hint="Rationalize the denominator of each term in the sum." solution="Each term of the sum can be simplified by rationalizing the denominator:

      1n+n+1=1n+n+1β‹…n+1βˆ’nn+1βˆ’n\frac{1}{\sqrt{n} + \sqrt{n+1}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{n} + \sqrt{n+1}} \cdot \frac{\sqrt{n+1} - \sqrt{n}}{\sqrt{n+1} - \sqrt{n}}

      =n+1βˆ’n(n+1)2βˆ’(n)2=n+1βˆ’n(n+1)βˆ’n=n+1βˆ’n= \frac{\sqrt{n+1} - \sqrt{n}}{(\sqrt{n+1})^2 - (\sqrt{n})^2} = \frac{\sqrt{n+1} - \sqrt{n}}{(n+1) - n} = \sqrt{n+1} - \sqrt{n}

      The sum SS is therefore a telescoping sum:
      S=βˆ‘n=199(n+1βˆ’n)S = \sum_{n=1}^{99} (\sqrt{n+1} - \sqrt{n})

      S=(2βˆ’1)+(3βˆ’2)+(4βˆ’3)+β‹―+(100βˆ’99)S = (\sqrt{2} - \sqrt{1}) + (\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{2}) + (\sqrt{4} - \sqrt{3}) + \dots + (\sqrt{100} - \sqrt{99})

      All intermediate terms cancel out, leaving:
      S=100βˆ’1=10βˆ’1=9S = \sqrt{100} - \sqrt{1} = 10 - 1 = 9

      The value of SS is 9."
      :::

      ---

      What's Next?

      πŸ’‘ Continue Your CMI Journey

      Having gained proficiency in comparing sequences and bounding sums, you are now well-prepared to extend these concepts. The principles explored here form a crucial foundation for related chapters on inequalities involving functions, which delve into continuous analogues through tools like convexity, concavity, and integral inequalities. Furthermore, chapters on advanced asymptotic analysis and estimation will build upon the growth comparisons introduced, providing more sophisticated methods for approximating and analyzing the behavior of sequences and functions at large scales, which is vital for advanced CMI problems.

🎯 Key Points to Remember

  • βœ“ Master the core concepts in Inequality in sequences and sums before moving to advanced topics
  • βœ“ Practice with previous year questions to understand exam patterns
  • βœ“ Review short notes regularly for quick revision before exams

Related Topics in Inequalities and Estimation

More Resources

Why Choose MastersUp?

🎯

AI-Powered Plans

Personalized study schedules based on your exam date and learning pace

πŸ“š

15,000+ Questions

Verified questions with detailed solutions from past papers

πŸ“Š

Smart Analytics

Track your progress with subject-wise performance insights

πŸ”–

Bookmark & Revise

Save important questions for quick revision before exams

Start Your Free Preparation β†’

No credit card required β€’ Free forever for basic features