100% FREE
Updated: Apr 2026 Inequalities and Estimation Functional and sequence inequalities
Inequality in sequences and sums
Comprehensive study notes on Inequality in sequences and sums for CMI BS Hons preparation.
This chapter covers key concepts, formulas, and examples needed for your exam.
This chapter introduces fundamental techniques for analyzing inequalities within sequences and sums. Mastery of these methods is crucial for establishing bounds, determining convergence, and performing estimations, which are frequently assessed in advanced mathematical examinations.
Term-wise comparison is one of the cleanest ways to prove inequalities involving sequences and sums. The idea is simple: compare corresponding terms first, then add. In exam problems, this basic principle is often hidden inside fractions, radicals, powers, or recursive-looking expressions. The real skill is identifying a simpler upper or lower bound for each term.
---
Learning Objectives
βBy the End of This Topic
After studying this topic, you will be able to:
Compare sums by comparing their terms individually.
Use upper and lower bounds on each term to estimate a whole sum.
Apply comparison correctly when terms are positive, negative, or sign-changing.
Use reciprocal and denominator-based comparison carefully.
Avoid invalid term-wise arguments in products and nonlinear expressions.
---
Core Principle
πTerm-wise comparison
Suppose two sequences satisfy
akββ€bkβforΒ everyΒ k=1,2,β¦,n
Then adding these inequalities gives
βk=1nβakββ€βk=1nβbkβ
This is the most basic form of term-wise comparison.
βWhat This Means
If each term on the left is no larger than the corresponding term on the right, then the whole left sum is no larger than the whole right sum.
---
Basic Sum Comparison Rules
πFinite Sums
If
akββ€bkβforΒ allΒ 1β€kβ€n
then
a1β+a2β+β―+anββ€b1β+b2β+β―+bnβ
Also, if
akββ₯0forΒ allΒ k
then
βk=1nβakββ₯0
πBounding by a Constant
If for each k,
mβ€akββ€M
then
nmβ€βk=1nβakββ€nM
This is one of the fastest tools for estimating sums.
---
Comparing Fractions Term by Term
πSame Numerator, Different Denominator
If
0<xβ€y
then
x1ββ₯y1β
So if denominators become larger, the reciprocals become smaller.
This gives a common exam trick:
If
dkββ₯ekβ>0
then
dkβ1ββ€ekβ1β
and hence
βk=1nβdkβ1ββ€βk=1nβekβ1β
:::
---
Positive-Term Comparison
πStandard Positive-Term Logic
If
0β€akββ€bkβ
for all k, then automatically
βk=1nβakββ€βk=1nβbkβ
This is especially useful for:
rational terms
roots
trigonometric bounds
comparison of series with positive terms
---
Comparison for Infinite Series
πComparison Test Idea
If
0β€akββ€bkβ
for all large k, then:
if βbkβ converges, then βakβ also converges
if βakβ diverges and akββ€bkβ, then βbkβ also diverges
This is the series version of term-wise comparison.
Even when the topic is framed in finite sums, this idea often appears in advanced problems.
---
Very Common Bounding Patterns
πUseful Term-wise Bounds
For positive integers k and n:
if kβ€n, then
k1ββ₯n1β
if kβ₯1, then
k+11ββ€k1β
if k2β₯k, then
k21ββ€k1β
if 0β€xβ€y, then
xββ€yβ
if 0<xβ€y, then
y1ββ€x1β
These simple inequalities power many larger estimates.
---
How to Build a Term-wise Estimate
π‘Standard Strategy
To bound a sum
βakβ,
look at each term and try to replace it by something:
simpler
always larger, for an upper bound
always smaller, for a lower bound
Then add the new inequalities.
Examples of replacements:
replace a complicated denominator by a smaller or larger one
replace k2+kβ by something easier to compare with
compare k2+1 with k2
compare k(k+1) with k2
:::
---
Minimal Worked Examples
Example 1
Show that
βk=1nβk(k+1)1ββ€βk=1nβk21β
For each kβ₯1,
k(k+1)β₯k2
so
k(k+1)1ββ€k21β
Now add term by term:
βk=1nβk(k+1)1ββ€βk=1nβk21β
---
Example 2
Show that for positive integers n,
βk=1nβn+11ββ€βk=1nβk1β
For each k=1,2,β¦,n, we have
kβ€n+1
so
n+11ββ€k1β
Now add over all k:
nβ n+11ββ€βk=1nβk1β
Hence
n+1nββ€βk=1nβk1β
---
When Term-wise Comparison Is Safe
βSafe Uses
Term-wise comparison is safe when:
you compare corresponding terms
the inequality direction is correct for each term
you only add the inequalities
denominators stay positive when taking reciprocals
---
When It Can Fail
β οΈAvoid These Errors
β If akββ€bkβ, then ak2ββ€bk2β without checking signs
β This is safe only under extra sign conditions
β If akββ€bkβ, then akβ1ββ€bkβ1β
β False for positive numbers; reciprocals reverse inequality
β Comparing sums by comparing βaverage sizeβ informally
β Compare each term precisely
β Using term-wise comparison for products without justification
β Addition is naturally compatible with term-wise inequality; products need extra care
---
A Useful Symmetric Estimate
πAverage-Type Bound
If
mβ€akββ€M
for all k=1,2,β¦,n, then dividing the sum bound by n gives
mβ€na1β+β―+anβββ€M
So the average also lies between the term-wise minimum and maximum.
This often appears in olympiad-style estimation.
---
Standard Patterns to Recognize
πHigh-Value Patterns
Replace each denominator by something smaller or larger.
Compare each summand with a constant.
Compare each summand with the first or last term.
Use positivity to preserve inequality under summation.
Use reciprocal reversal carefully when terms are positive.
---
CMI Strategy
π‘How to Attack Term-wise Comparison Problems
First inspect one general term, not the whole sum.
Decide whether you want an upper bound or a lower bound.
Replace each term by a simpler comparable term.
Check sign conditions before taking reciprocals or squaring.
Only after the term-wise inequality is correct should you add.
---
Practice Questions
:::question type="MCQ" question="If 0<akββ€bkβ for each k=1,2,β¦,n, then which of the following is always true?" options=["βk=1nβakββ₯βk=1nβbkβ","βk=1nβakββ€βk=1nβbkβ","βk=1nβakββ€βk=1nβbkβ","akβ1ββ€bkβ1β for each k"] answer="B" hint="Adding preserves the inequality direction term by term." solution="Since akββ€bkβ for every k, we may add the inequalities:
βk=1nβakββ€βk=1nβbkβ
So the correct option is Bβ."
:::
:::question type="NAT" question="Find a lower bound for βk=15βk1β using the term-wise comparison k1ββ₯51β for k=1,2,3,4,5." answer="1" hint="Replace each term by 51β and add." solution="For each k=1,2,3,4,5,
k1ββ₯51β
So
βk=15βk1ββ₯5β 51β=1
Hence the required lower bound is 1β."
:::
:::question type="MSQ" question="Which of the following are always true for positive numbers xβ€y?" options=["x1ββ₯y1β","xββ€yβ","x2β€y2","x1ββ€y1β"] answer="A,B,C" hint="Check monotonicity of reciprocal, square root, and squaring on positive numbers." solution="1. True, reciprocals reverse the order for positive numbers.
True, square root is increasing.
True, squaring preserves order for positive numbers.
False, it reverses the wrong way.
Hence the correct answer is A,B,Cβ."
:::
:::question type="SUB" question="Show that βk=1nβk+11ββ€βk=1nβk1β for every positive integer n." answer="True, by term-wise comparison" hint="Compare k+11β and k1β for each k." solution="For every positive integer k,
k+1β₯k>0
So by reciprocal comparison,
k+11ββ€k1β
Now add these inequalities for k=1,2,β¦,n:
βk=1nβk+11ββ€βk=1nβk1β
Hence the inequality is proved term by term. Therefore the statement is trueβ."
:::
---
Summary
βKey Takeaways for CMI
If akββ€bkβ term by term, then their sums satisfy the same inequality.
Bounding each term by a constant gives a fast estimate for the full sum.
Reciprocal inequalities reverse direction for positive numbers.
Term-wise comparison is strongest when every term is positive and easy to control.
The main art is choosing the right simpler comparison term.
Check signs before using nonlinear operations like reciprocal or square.
---
π‘Next Up
Proceeding to Sum bounds.
---
Part 2: Sum bounds
Sum Bounds
Overview
Sum bounds are inequalities that estimate how large or how small a sum can be under given conditions. In sequence and sum problems, this topic appears constantly: bounding a sum from below using product information, bounding a sum of squares using a fixed total, or using termwise estimates and Cauchy-type inequalities. In exam problems, the main challenge is choosing the correct inequality direction.
---
Learning Objectives
βBy the End of This Topic
After studying this topic, you will be able to:
Find lower and upper bounds for sums under simple constraints.
Use AM-GM to bound sums from below.
Use Cauchy-Schwarz to bound sums and sums of squares.
Recognise when termwise bounds immediately yield a sum bound.
Decide when equality is possible in a sum bound problem.
---
Core Idea
πWhat is a sum bound?
A sum bound is an inequality of the form
Sβ₯something or
Sβ€something
where S is a sum such as
a1β+a2β+β―+anβ or
a12β+a22β+β―+an2β
The main tools depend on what information is given:
fixed product
fixed sum
lower/upper bounds on each term
relation between sum and sum of squares
:::
---
Termwise Bounds
πImmediate Bounds
If
mβ€aiββ€M for each i=1,2,β¦,n,
then
nmβ€a1β+a2β+β―+anββ€nM
This is the quickest way to bound a sum when each term is individually controlled.
:::
---
AM-GM for Sum Lower Bounds
πAM-GM Lower Bound
For positive numbers a1β,a2β,β¦,anβ,
a1β+a2β+β―+anββ₯nna1βa2ββ―anββ
This gives a lower bound on the sum when the product is known.
Equivalently,
x12β+x22β+β―+xn2ββ₯n(x1β+x2β+β―+xnβ)2β
:::
This is one of the most important lower bounds for a sum of squares.
:::
---
Fixed Sum, Minimum Sum of Squares
βMinimum Sum of Squares
If
x1β+x2β+β―+xnβ=S,
then
x12β+x22β+β―+xn2ββ₯nS2β
Equality holds when all variables are equal:
x1β=x2β=β―=xnβ=nSβ
This is a direct application of Cauchy-Schwarz or QM-AM.
---
Fixed Product, Minimum Sum
πAnother Important Sum Bound
If
x1βx2ββ―xnβ=P with all variables positive, then
x1β+x2β+β―+xnββ₯nnPβ
Equality holds when all variables are equal.
So fixed product gives a lower bound on the sum.
---
Useful Special Cases
πQuick Forms to Memorise
For positive x,y:
x+yβ₯2xyβ
x2+y2β₯2(x+y)2β
For real x,y,z:
x2+y2+z2β₯3(x+y+z)2β
For positive a,b,c with abc=1:
a+b+cβ₯3
---
Minimal Worked Examples
Example 1
If x+y+z=12, find the minimum value of x2+y2+z2.
By Cauchy-Schwarz,
$\qquad x^2+y^2+z^2 \ge \dfrac{(x+y+z)^2}{3}
= \dfrac{12^2}{3}=48$
Equality occurs at
x=y=z=4
So the minimum value is 48β.
---
Example 2
If xy=16 and x,y>0, find the minimum value of x+y.
By AM-GM,
x+yβ₯2xyβ=216β=8
Equality occurs at
x=y=4
So the minimum value is 8β.
---
Equality Cases
βWhen is the Bound Sharp?
In most standard sum-bound problems, equality occurs when all relevant terms are equal.
Examples:
for x+yβ₯2xyβ, equality at x=y
for x2+y2+z2β₯3(x+y+z)2β, equality at x=y=z
for a1β+β―+anββ₯nna1ββ―anββ, equality when all aiβ are equal
Always check whether the problemβs constraints allow equality.
---
Common Mistakes
β οΈAvoid These Errors
β Using a lower-bound inequality when the problem asks for an upper bound
β First decide the required direction
β Applying AM-GM to numbers that are not known to be nonnegative
β Standard AM-GM needs nonnegative terms
β Forgetting that the sum of squares is usually minimized, not maximized, under fixed sum
β Cauchy gives a lower bound
β Stopping after getting a bound without checking equality
β A sharp answer needs the equality case
---
CMI Strategy
π‘How to Attack Sum-Bound Problems
Identify the target sum clearly.
Check what is fixed: sum, product, or termwise bounds.
If product is fixed and terms are positive, try AM-GM.
If sum is fixed and you see squares, try Cauchy-Schwarz.
Check whether the bound is intended to be sharp, and identify equality.
---
Practice Questions
:::question type="MCQ" question="If x+y=10, then the least possible value of x2+y2 is" options=["25","50","100","20"] answer="B" hint="Use the lower bound for sum of squares." solution="We use
x2+y2β₯2(x+y)2β
So
x2+y2β₯2102β=50
Equality occurs when x=y=5.
Hence the correct option is Bβ."
:::
:::question type="NAT" question="If abc=8 and a,b,c>0, find the minimum possible value of a+b+c." answer="6" hint="Use AM-GM." solution="By AM-GM,
a+b+cβ₯33abcβ=338β=6
Equality occurs when a=b=c=2.
Hence the minimum value is 6β."
:::
:::question type="MSQ" question="Which of the following are always true?" options=["For positive x,y, x+yβ₯2xyβ","For real x,y,z, x2+y2+z2β₯3(x+y+z)2β","If each aiββ€4 for i=1,β¦,n, then βaiββ€4n","If xy=1, then x+yβ€2 for positive x,y"] answer="A,B,C" hint="Check the direction of each inequality." solution="1. True by AM-GM.
True by Cauchy-Schwarz.
True by termwise upper bound.
False. By AM-GM, if xy=1, then x+yβ₯2.
Hence the correct answer is A,B,Cβ."
:::
:::question type="SUB" question="Prove that for real numbers x1β,x2β,β¦,xnβ, one has x12β+x22β+β―+xn2ββ₯n(x1β+x2β+β―+xnβ)2β." answer="Use Cauchy-Schwarz." hint="Apply Cauchy to (x1β,β¦,xnβ) and (1,β¦,1)." solution="By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality,
(x12β+x22β+β―+xn2β)(12+12+β―+12)β₯(x1β+x2β+β―+xnβ)2
Since there are n ones,
12+12+β―+12=n
So
n(x12β+x22β+β―+xn2β)β₯(x1β+x2β+β―+xnβ)2
Dividing by n, we get
x12β+x22β+β―+xn2ββ₯n(x1β+x2β+β―+xnβ)2β
This proves the result."
:::
---
Summary
βKey Takeaways for CMI
Sum bounds depend on what information is given.
AM-GM gives lower bounds for sums when the product is fixed.
Cauchy-Schwarz gives lower bounds for sums of squares when the sum is fixed.
Termwise bounds immediately give bounds on the whole sum.
Equality cases usually occur when the relevant variables are equal.
---
π‘Next Up
Proceeding to Product-sum comparison.
---
Part 3: Product-sum comparison
Product-Sum Comparison
Overview
Product-sum comparison is a central theme in inequalities. Many exam problems ask whether a product is at most a certain sum expression, or whether a sum is at least a certain product-driven quantity. The main tool is usually AM-GM, but the real skill is recognising the direction of comparison and the condition under which equality occurs.
---
Learning Objectives
βBy the End of This Topic
After studying this topic, you will be able to:
Compare sums and products of positive quantities using AM-GM.
Solve fixed-sum maximum-product problems.
Solve fixed-product minimum-sum problems.
Recognise equality cases quickly.
Use algebraic identities to prove sharp two-variable product-sum inequalities.
---
Core Idea
πWhat is product-sum comparison?
A product-sum comparison problem studies expressions such as
x+yandxy
or, more generally,
x1β+x2β+β―+xnβandx1βx2ββ―xnβ
under assumptions like positivity, fixed sum, or fixed product.
The most important general principle is:
for fixed positive sum, the product is largest when the variables are equal
for fixed positive product, the sum is smallest when the variables are equal
Equality holds if and only if
x1β=x2β=β―=xnβ
:::
---
Two-Variable Product-Sum Relations
πMost Used Two-Variable Forms
For positive x,y,
x+yβ₯2xyβ
xyβ€(2x+yβ)2
(xβy)2β₯0βΉ(x+y)2β₯4xy
All three statements are equivalent.
These are the standard sharp comparisons between sum and product of two positive numbers.
---
Fixed Sum, Maximum Product
βMaximum Product Under Fixed Sum
If positive numbers x1β,x2β,β¦,xnβ satisfy
x1β+x2β+β―+xnβ=S
then
x1βx2ββ―xnββ€(nSβ)n
Equality holds when all variables are equal:
x1β=x2β=β―=xnβ=nSβ
For n=2, if x+y=S, then
xyβ€4S2β
:::
---
Fixed Product, Minimum Sum
βMinimum Sum Under Fixed Product
If positive numbers x1β,x2β,β¦,xnβ satisfy
x1βx2ββ―xnβ=P
then
x1β+x2β+β―+xnββ₯nnPβ
Equality holds when all variables are equal.
For n=2, if xy=P, then
x+yβ₯2Pβ
:::
---
Standard Consequences
πFrequently Used Consequences
For positive x,y,z:
if xyz=1, then
x+y+zβ₯3
if xyz=k, then
x+y+zβ₯33kβ
if x+y+z=S, then
xyzβ€(3Sβ)3
if x+y=S, then
xyβ€4S2β
if xy=P, then
x+yβ₯2Pβ
---
Minimal Worked Examples
Example 1
If x+y=10 and x,y>0, find the maximum value of xy.
Using
xyβ€(2x+yβ)2
we get
xyβ€(210β)2=25
Equality occurs at
x=y=5
So the maximum value is 25β.
---
Example 2
If xyz=8 and x,y,z>0, find the minimum value of x+y+z.
By AM-GM,
x+y+zβ₯33xyzβ=338β=6
Equality occurs when
x=y=z=2
So the minimum value is 6β.
---
Equality Case: Why It Matters
π‘Equality is Half the Problem
In olympiad-style and CMI-style inequality questions, the answer is often not complete until you identify when equality occurs.
For product-sum comparison using AM-GM, the equality condition is usually:
allΒ comparedΒ positiveΒ termsΒ areΒ equal
So whenever you see a sharp bound, always ask:
when is it attained?
is equality allowed under the given conditions?
:::
---
Common Mistakes
β οΈAvoid These Errors
β Applying AM-GM to numbers that are not known to be positive
β Standard AM-GM requires nonnegative numbers, and most sharp forms are used for positive numbers
β Forgetting the equality case
β Equality usually occurs when the relevant variables are equal
β Claiming that product is always less than sum without conditions
β The comparison depends on positivity and constraints such as fixed sum or fixed product
β Using a fixed-sum idea in a fixed-product problem
β First decide what is being held constant
---
CMI Strategy
π‘How to Attack Product-Sum Problems
Ask whether the problem fixes the sum or fixes the product.
If the sum is fixed, think βproduct is maximized when equal.β
If the product is fixed, think βsum is minimized when equal.β
For two variables, also test (xβy)2β₯0.
Check the equality case before finalising the answer.
---
Practice Questions
:::question type="MCQ" question="If x,y>0 and x+y=14, the maximum value of xy is" options=["24","36","49","98"] answer="C" hint="Use the two-variable fixed-sum product bound." solution="For positive x,y with fixed sum,
xyβ€(2x+yβ)2
So
xyβ€(214β)2=49
Equality occurs at x=y=7.
Hence the correct option is Cβ."
:::
:::question type="NAT" question="If x,y,z>0 and xyz=27, find the minimum value of x+y+z." answer="9" hint="Use AM-GM for three variables." solution="By AM-GM,
x+y+zβ₯33xyzβ=3327β=9
Equality occurs when x=y=z=3.
Hence the minimum value is 9β."
:::
:::question type="MSQ" question="Which of the following are true for positive numbers?" options=["x+yβ₯2xyβ","If x+y is fixed, then xy is maximized when x=y","If xy is fixed, then x+y is maximized when x=y","If xyz=1, then x+y+zβ₯3"] answer="A,B,D" hint="Separate fixed-sum and fixed-product statements carefully." solution="1. True by AM-GM.
True.
False. For fixed product, the sum is minimized, not maximized, when the variables are equal.
True by AM-GM.
Hence the correct answer is A,B,Dβ."
:::
:::question type="SUB" question="Prove that for positive real numbers x and y with x+y=S, one has xyβ€4S2β, and determine when equality holds." answer="Use (xβy)2β₯0 or AM-GM." hint="Start from a square that is always nonnegative." solution="Since
(xβy)2β₯0,
we get
x2β2xy+y2β₯0
So
x2+2xy+y2β₯4xy
That is,
(x+y)2β₯4xy
Now x+y=S, so
S2β₯4xy
Hence
xyβ€4S2β
Equality holds if and only if
(xβy)2=0, that is, when
x=y=2Sβ.
Thus the product is at most 4S2β, with equality when the two numbers are equal."
:::
---
Summary
βKey Takeaways for CMI
Product-sum comparison is mainly governed by AM-GM.
Fixed sum gives maximum product at equality.
Fixed product gives minimum sum at equality.
For two variables, (xβy)2β₯0 is often the fastest route.
Equality conditions are essential in sharp inequality problems.
---
π‘Next Up
Proceeding to Growth comparison.
---
Part 4: Growth comparison
Growth Comparison
Overview
Growth comparison is the study of deciding which of two expressions is larger without always computing exact values. In CMI-style questions, this often involves comparing powers, factorials, logarithms, radicals, and sums by using structure rather than direct expansion. The main skill is to choose the right comparison tool.
---
Learning Objectives
βBy the End of This Topic
After studying this topic, you will be able to:
Compare expressions involving powers, factorials, logarithms, and radicals.
Use monotonicity, convexity, and concavity to compare nearby values.
Apply AM-GM and simple product bounds to factorial-type comparisons.
Compare large powers by scaling or normalising.
Detect when direct computation is unnecessary and a structural argument is enough.
---
Core Idea
πWhat is growth comparison?
Growth comparison means deciding whether one expression is less than, equal to, or greater than another by using known behaviour of functions and sequences.
Typical examples:
comparing 5+55ββ with an integer
comparing log2β11 with an average of two logarithmic values
comparing nn with n! or (n!)2
comparing sums like am+bm with cm
---
First Tool: Monotonicity
πIncreasing and Decreasing Functions
If f is increasing, then
a<bβΉf(a)<f(b)
If f is decreasing, then
a<bβΉf(a)>f(b)
This is the simplest comparison tool. It is often enough for:
square roots
logarithms
exponentials
reciprocal functions on positive intervals
Example
To compare 5+55ββ with 4, square both sides because the square root function is increasing on nonnegative numbers.
5+55ββ>4βΊ5+55β>1655β>11
Since 5β>2, the right side is true. Hence the expression is greater than 4.
---
Second Tool: Concavity and Convexity
πConcavity and Convexity
A function with fβ²β²(x)<0 on an interval is concave there.
A function with fβ²β²(x)>0 on an interval is convex there.
πMidpoint Comparison
If f is concave, then
f(2x+yβ)β₯2f(x)+f(y)β
If f is convex, then
f(2x+yβ)β€2f(x)+f(y)β
This is extremely useful for growth comparison.
Important examples
logx is concave on x>0
xβ is concave on x>0
xr is convex on x>0 for r>1
---
Logarithmic Comparison
πConcavity of logx
Since logx is concave on positive numbers,
log(2x+yβ)β₯2logx+logyβ
Equivalently,
logxβ€2loga+logbβ
whenever xβ€abβ
This is often the cleanest way to compare one logarithm with the average of two others.
Example
To compare
log2β11and21+log2β61β
note that 1=log2β2, so the right-hand side is
2log2β2+log2β61β
Using log rules,
2log2β2+log2β61β=2log2β(122)β=log2β122β
So the comparison becomes
log2β11<?βlog2β122β
Since log2βx is increasing, this is equivalent to
11<122β
which is false because 121<122, so actually 11<122β is true.
Hence
log2β11<21+log2β61β
---
Equality holds if and only if all the terms are equal.
AM-GM is one of the most effective tools for growth comparison.
Common uses
comparing products with powers
estimating factorials
comparing symmetric expressions
---
Factorial vs Power Comparisons
πA Useful Pairing Trick
To compare (n!)2 with nn, write
(n!)2=βk=1nβk(n+1βk)
Now compare each factor k(n+1βk) with n.
For 1β€kβ€n,
k(n+1βk)β₯n
because
k(n+1βk)βn=(kβ1)(nβk)β₯0
Hence every factor is at least n, so
(n!)2=βk=1nβk(n+1βk)β₯nn
This is a very elegant comparison.
Example
With n=2023,
(2023!)2β₯(2023)2023
and in fact the inequality is strict because not all factors are exactly 2023.
So
(2023)2023<(2023!)2
---
Fourth Tool: Normalisation
πCompare by Dividing by a Common Large Quantity
When comparing large powers like
am+bmandcm
with a,b<c, divide everything by cm.
Then the comparison becomes
(caβ)m+(cbβ)m<?β1
This is usually much easier.
Example
Compare
92100+93100and94100
Divide by 94100:
(9492β)100+(9493β)100<?β1
Now
9492β<9493β<1
So
(9492β)100<(9493β)100
Hence the sum is less than
2(9493β)100
It remains to show
2(9493β)100<1
That is equivalent to
2<(9394β)100
which is true because (1+931β)100>2 is easy to verify using binomial expansion or exponential growth.
So
92100+93100<94100
---
Fifth Tool: Replace by Simpler Bounds
π‘Bounding Strategy
If exact comparison is hard, replace each expression by an easier upper or lower bound.
Typical examples:
5β>2
log is increasing
1+x<ex for x>0
(1+t)n>1+nt for t>β1 and integer nβ₯1
This often reduces a difficult-looking inequality to a short argument.
---
Standard Growth Hierarchy
πVery Important Order of Growth
For large n, the typical growth order is
lognβͺnΞ±βͺanβͺn!βͺnn
for fixed Ξ±>0 and fixed a>1.
This is useful intuition, but in olympiad-style or exam questions you still need a proof for the exact comparison asked.
---
Minimal Worked Examples
Example 1
Compare 17β and 4.
Since the square root function is increasing,
17β>4βΊ17>16
which is true.
---
Example 2
Compare 95+95 and 105.
We have
95+95=2β 95
So compare 2 and (910β)5.
Since
(910β)5>1+95β
we get (910β)5>914β>1.5, but this is not enough alone to beat 2.
Compute directly:
2β 95=118098
and
105=100000
So here
95+95>105
This shows that normalisation is useful, but the estimate must be strong enough.
---
Common Mistakes
β οΈAvoid These Errors
β Comparing large expressions by raw decimal approximation too early
β First look for structure, monotonicity, or factorisation
β Using concavity or convexity in the wrong direction
β Check whether the function bends upward or downward
β Forgetting that logarithms are increasing only on positive inputs
β Always check domain
β Using βgrowth orderβ intuition as a proof in a finite problem
β A finite comparison still needs a clear argument
β Applying AM-GM to nonpositive terms
β AM-GM requires positivity
---
CMI Strategy
π‘How to Attack Growth Comparison Questions
First identify the expression type: radical, logarithm, power, factorial, or sum of powers.
Check whether monotonicity solves it immediately.
If an average appears, test concavity or convexity.
If factorials appear, try pairing factors or AM-GM.
If large powers appear, divide by the largest power.
Use a clean inequality, not a messy numerical approximation.
---
Practice Questions
:::question type="MCQ" question="Which function is concave on (0,β)?" options=["x2","x3","logx","ex"] answer="C" hint="Check second derivatives or known standard facts." solution="Among the given functions, logx is concave on (0,β). The functions x2, x3 on (0,β), and ex are convex there. Hence the correct option is Cβ."
:::
:::question type="NAT" question="Evaluate the sign of (6!)2β66 by entering 1 if positive, 0 if zero, and β1 if negative." answer="1" hint="Use the pairing trick (n!)2=βk=1nβk(n+1βk)." solution="We write
(6!)2=βk=16βk(7βk)
Now each factor k(7βk) is at least 6, and for some values it is strictly bigger than 6. Hence
(6!)2>66
So the quantity (6!)2β66 is positive. Therefore the required answer is 1β."
:::
:::question type="MSQ" question="Which of the following statements are true?" options=["10β>3","log2β8<log2β9","If f is concave, then f(2x+yβ)β₯2f(x)+f(y)β","For all positive integers n, (n!)2β₯nn"] answer="A,B,C,D" hint="Use monotonicity, concavity, and factorial pairing." solution="1. True, since 10>9 and square root is increasing.
True, since log2βx is increasing and 8<9.
True, this is the midpoint form of concavity.
True, because (n!)2=βk=1nβk(n+1βk) and each factor is at least n.
Hence the correct answer is A,B,C,Dβ."
:::
:::question type="SUB" question="Explain why (n!)2β₯nn for every positive integer n." answer="Write (n!)2=βk=1nβk(n+1βk) and note each factor is at least n." hint="Pair the kth and (n+1βk)th factors." solution="We have
(n!)2=(βk=1nβk)(βk=1nβ(n+1βk))=βk=1nβk(n+1βk)
Now for each k,
k(n+1βk)βn=(kβ1)(nβk)β₯0
Hence
k(n+1βk)β₯n
Therefore every factor in the product is at least n, so
(n!)2=βk=1nβk(n+1βk)β₯βk=1nβn=nn
Thus (n!)2β₯nn for every positive integer n."
:::
---
Summary
βKey Takeaways for CMI
Growth comparison depends more on choosing the right tool than on long computation.
Use monotonicity for radicals, logs, and exponentials.
Use concavity and convexity when averages or midpoint comparisons appear.
Use AM-GM or factor pairing for factorial comparisons.
Use normalisation when comparing sums of large powers with a single larger power.
A clean structural proof is usually better than a decimal estimate.
---
Chapter Summary
βInequality in sequences and sums β Key Points
Term-wise Comparison and Monotonicity: The fundamental approach for establishing inequalities between sequences and their sums often relies on demonstrating term-by-term dominance or consistent monotonicity. Bounding Sums and Products: Integral comparison, the AM-GM inequality, and Cauchy-Schwarz are indispensable tools for deriving precise upper and lower bounds for both finite and infinite sums and products. Growth Rates and Asymptotic Analysis: Understanding the asymptotic behavior of sequence terms is crucial for evaluating limits of sums, determining convergence properties, and making accurate approximations, frequently involving comparisons with known series. Jensen's Inequality: This powerful principle connects the convexity or concavity of functions to inequalities involving sums and averages, offering a versatile approach for problems with functional transformations. Classic Inequalities: Proficient application of foundational inequalities such as AM-GM, Cauchy-Schwarz, Bernoulli's, Rearrangement, and Chebyshev's forms the bedrock for solving a wide spectrum of complex problems involving sequences and sums. Inductive and Constructive Methods: Many sequence-based inequalities can be rigorously proven through mathematical induction or by ingeniously constructing auxiliary sequences or functions that simplify the comparison process.
---
Chapter Review Questions
:::question type="MCQ" question="Consider the sum Snβ=βk=1nβkβ1β. Which of the following is true for sufficiently large n?" options=["Snβ<nβ", "Snββ2nβ", "Snβ>n", "Snβ converges to a finite value."] answer="Snββ2nβ" hint="Compare the sum with an integral of a decreasing function." solution="The function f(x)=1/xβ is decreasing. We can bound the sum using integrals:
As nββ, Snβ grows approximately as 2nβ. Therefore, Snββ2nβ is the correct statement." :::
:::question type="NAT" question="Let a1β,a2β,β¦,anβ be positive real numbers such that βi=1nβaiβ=1. Find the minimum value of βi=1nβaiβ1β." answer="n^2" hint="Consider using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality or AM-HM inequality." solution="By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, for positive real numbers xiβ,yiβ:
Given βi=1nβaiβ=1, we substitute this into the inequality:
(1)(i=1βnβaiβ1β)β₯n2
Thus, βi=1nβaiβ1ββ₯n2. Equality holds when aiβ=1/n for all i. The minimum value is n2." :::
:::question type="MCQ" question="Let anβ=(1+n1β)n and bnβ=βk=0nβk!1β. Which of the following statements is true?" options=["anβ>bnβ for all nβ₯1.", "limnβββanβ=limnβββbnβ.", "anβ converges but bnβ diverges.", "bnβ converges but anβ diverges."] answer="limnβββanβ=limnβββbnβ." hint="Recall the definitions of the mathematical constant e." solution="Both sequences anβ and bnβ are fundamental definitions or approximations of the mathematical constant e. The limit of anβ=(1+n1β)n as nββ is e. The limit of bnβ=βk=0nβk!1β as nββ is also e (this is the Taylor series expansion for ex evaluated at x=1). Since both sequences converge to the same value e, their limits are equal. (Note: It is also true that anβ<bnβ for all nβ₯1, but the question asks for a true statement, and the limit equality is unequivocally true.)" :::
:::question type="NAT" question="Let S=βn=199βnβ+n+1β1β. Find the value of S." answer="9" hint="Rationalize the denominator of each term in the sum." solution="Each term of the sum can be simplified by rationalizing the denominator:
Having gained proficiency in comparing sequences and bounding sums, you are now well-prepared to extend these concepts. The principles explored here form a crucial foundation for related chapters on inequalities involving functions, which delve into continuous analogues through tools like convexity, concavity, and integral inequalities. Furthermore, chapters on advanced asymptotic analysis and estimation will build upon the growth comparisons introduced, providing more sophisticated methods for approximating and analyzing the behavior of sequences and functions at large scales, which is vital for advanced CMI problems.
π― Key Points to Remember
βMaster the core concepts in Inequality in sequences and sums before moving to advanced topics
βPractice with previous year questions to understand exam patterns
βReview short notes regularly for quick revision before exams